“Arthur Koestler: The
Zealot”
Hitchens’ review of Michael Scammell’s Koestler: The Literary and Political Odyssey of a Twentieth-Century
Skeptic. Hitchens describes Koestler as a great writer (especially as
demonstrated in his tour de force Darkness
at Noon) but very troubled personally. Perhaps driven by his extreme
insecurity, he describes Koestler as intellectually “promiscuous.” Hitchens
writes that Koestler was very insecure about his writing. “ [He] once wrote a
defensive third-person preface to one of his later novels (The Age of Longing)
in which he described its style as modeled on that of a certain ‘A. Koestler,’
whose writing, ‘lacking in ornament and distinction, is easy to imitate.’ ”
His shifts in position where not subtle: first, a staunch
supporter of Communism (and active participant in the Spanish Civil War) but
later writes one of the most influential ant-communist books ever; first, a
supporter of Begin’s ultra-nationalist
Zionist group and later questioning whether there should be a Jewish state at
all.
Later in life, sadly, his mental faculties started to fail
him, “…in his last two decades Koestler abandoned every kind of scruple and
objectivity and became successively bewitched by ‘theories’ of levitation, ESP,
telepathy, and UFOs.”
Eventually, this led to his suicide (and his last wife’s along with him).
With Uri Geller:
New learning: During the Spanish Civil War, Koestler spent four days jailed by the Nationalist forces in Malaga.
New word: deracinated = “déraciné, uprooted or displaced
from one’s geographical or social environment
No comments:
Post a Comment