“Anthony Powell: An
Omnivorous Curiosity”
Hitchens’ review of To
Keep The Ball Rolling: The Memoirs of Anthony Powell. Sad to say that I had
never heard of “the pre-eminent novelist
of English traits.” Hichens is enamored: “…the task for which I happily
volunteer: recommending the reading of Anthony Powell. I say ‘happily’ because
I have never induced anyone to try him and been subsequently cursed for my
pains.” It seems that Powell (pronounced in the Welsh as rhyming with Noel) has
a reputation or being wordy, obtuse and elitist (or at least snobbish) in his
writings. Hitchens spends most of his essay trying to debunk this but his
examples of Powell’s writing subvert his efforts.
New Learning: Powell chose the hymns for Orwell’s funeral,
in 1950. Interesting as Powell was a staunch Tory and Orwell a well known
socialist.
New word: esurient = archaic term for hungry or greed. Hitchens
has a little section to make the point that Powell had “an almost affected
pleasure in the antique or the nearly expired …why say ‘esurient’ when
‘hungry-looking’ would do, or ‘inspissated’ instead of ‘stifling’?” Hitchens does the same throughout this piece…e.g.
“osbsequy” to mean funeral rites. Is this supposed to make me want to read Powell?
Picturre of Powell with a bust of Aristotle.
Of course, there is a society with a facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/Anthony.Powell.Society
No comments:
Post a Comment