“W. Somerset Maugham:
Poor Willie”
Hitchens' review of Somerset
Maugham: A Life, by Jeffrey Meyers. Hitchens doesn’t review the biography
so much as review Maugham as a write. Some notable quotes from the essay: “Maugham’s
overall debt to [Joseph] Conrad is so evident that one usually finishes by
putting him down and picking up the real thing”, “Note the slight
clumsiness, which seems to have inflected everything Maugham ever wrote”, “..one
sees that Maugham’s difficulty was not just a tinge of self-hatred but a real
inability to see literary ‘genius’ when he encountered it”, “Maugham’s
success was, in effect, in writing for people who did not have a clue about
English as a medium for either tragedy or comedy”, “Maugham
eventually received an honor from the Crown— but it was for ‘services to
literature,’ rather than for literature itself, and this distinction represents
all the difference in the world.” I don’t think Hitchens likes Maugham. The
essay dosen’t spend much time on Of Human
Bondage, Modern Library #66 on top 100 Enlgish Language Novels.
New learning: Prior to the First World War, Maugham was a
gynecologist “in a slum district of London.”
New word: catamite = archaic term for a boy kept for
homosexual purposes form the Latin catamitus.
Great graphic from http://betterbooktitles.com/...alternate title for Of Human Bondage.
No comments:
Post a Comment